Would you rather…

having a world without war would be way better because food can be renewed using the water and seeds in the earth, however, war is very hard to stop and it can kill even more people than a famine.

im hungry so a world without hunger obvi

War releases more anger and debt and debt means no food and no food means hunger but no war is less anger and debt and no debt means more food and more food means no hungy.

A world without war.. just look at it! people are dying you know!

if you do a world without hunger then you're gonna die in a month! but without war we can prevent death so NO WAR!!

agree

War seems like the obvious choice, but statistically far more people die from hunger than from war

So when you think about countries will go to war over food or steal food but no hunger means less wars

Statistically hunger had killed more people than wars & hunger has played a role in over 15 major historical conflict beginnings including the french revolution & WWII. A world without hunger would lessen wars & would bring down the global CDR by about 15% or 9 mil people/year.

War is terrible, especially for kids.